Every day we can have breakfast with examples that show that the world is unfair. We can because it is and because it is reflected in the media, even if it is not indicated. We do not do so, because it is difficult to release every day the logics of innocence, guilt, responsibilities, historical materialism… in breakfast, and detect some privilege in the unavoidable day to day. Some privileges are sometimes subtle. And the very means that, making these logics difficult, can easily make us enemies of the weak, have suddenly given us that the world is unfair and an image order that anyone can understand. Five people in the Titan diver, about seven hundred in a fishing boat. And we made teams, who do we need to save?
Titana has a lot of juice. I myself have believed “the ever more infinite curiosity better”, I have praised some crazy simple curiosity… until curiosity becomes mere entertainment. We have also believed that traveling is learned, that traveling is not harmful to anyone. And that journey was a technological demonstration, like rescue -- more civic than war toys -- we think the rescue artifacts that require scientific explanations are more advanced. And if there are so many resources to save some, why let others drown, that's been the question that has ignited us. What has punished us has been “let us drown”.
The point is that the problem is before. I don't know if breakfast curiosity comes before the trip begins. We live in the age of “one does not take away the other.” And it's a lie. One almost always takes off the other. Why one journey begins, why the other. Why neither one should start. Why one provokes the other. Why not start one should not start the other. The same question, "Who do we save it?" is a trap. Because some were safe before, others will never exist. Because some were already biography, other numbers. There was really nothing to compare.
Bidali zure iritzi artikuluak iritzia@argia.eus helbide elektronikora
ARGIAk ez du zertan bat etorri artikuluen edukiarekin. Idatzien gehienezko luzera 4.500 karakterekoa da (espazioak barne). Idazkera aldetik gutxieneko zuzentasun bat beharrezkoa da: batetik, ARGIAk ezin du hartu zuzenketa sakona egiteko lanik; bestetik, egitekotan edukia nahi gabe aldatzeko arriskua dago. ARGIAk azaleko zuzenketak edo moldaketak egingo dizkie artikuluei, behar izanez gero.
I really like science fiction, although in this genre stories are narrated in a very distant way. Using fiction, we work on new ways to explain and/or transform the complex reality we have. Ocativa E. Butler, a science fiction writer, said in an interview that it was very good... [+]
Over the past decade, France, the United Kingdom and the United States invaded Syria by breaking international law. In 2024, Washington still has a dozen military bases to occupy Syria and steals much of the country’s oil. Israel occupies the territories of Syria and... [+]
I do not know if the exhibition of the multidisciplinary art project Hamaika will reach your people.
Along with the works, eleven testimonies. There is everything in it: fear, pain, anger, hope, disappointment, strength... testimonies written with affection. People who live in... [+]
In an increasingly narrow interval between election campaigns, it should be remembered that we have entered the decisive years of the twenty-first century. To give just one example, scientists are terrified by the continual overcoming of ocean temperature records and no longer... [+]