I have done a review from the announcement of the pandemic to the tragedy in Valencia and have concluded that the disastrous institutional management that lies and forupe as firewalls is constant of the ruling class.

We do not have a valid substitute ruler as long as this pendular system is unchanged and there is no possible change of system as long as they dangerous adhere to so many powers. It will be legal, but not legitimate, or democratic.

Looking at the modern history of this country (19th century). Since the second half of the twentieth century and after the fall of the monarchy Isabel), located far away from the rest of the world, we are a self-proclaimed country. Particularly since the second decade, it sold mining rights (copper, lead, mercury, iron and tungsten) through the boilers and family farms to private capital and European banks.

Reviewing the sad events of the future civil wars, the bloodiest and this time with the complicity of the Catholic Church, it happened in the third decade of the twentieth century, in which that great foreign capital contributed weapons and pain, and therefore we have increased the double condition that we have today of being a war and economically colonized country, without forgetting that very soon we will also be culturally colonized.

This retrospective entry reaffirms us as a country mortgaged by the design and interests of multinational oligarchies, and submits us with its maximum to a globalist agenda like no one: -You won't have anything, but you'll be happy. Its operational scope, unlike in the other countries of the European Union, is not limited only to the citizens, but also to the whole nation and to Community goods: mountains, water and farmland. As all parties are the main sponsors of the 2030 Agenda, their elects (not for the people), which today occupy the whole of Parliament, are left out.

Despite the great apathy of the citizens in their area of comfort, in the face of the tragic event of Valencia and in the face of institutional inaction, the people have responded by creating a popular initiative of a broad sociopolitical spectrum: The people are the only ones who save the people.

The Spanish people, the Spanish space and the primary sector of the country feel drowned by a political class that has united around an external agenda and is plunged by debts and corruption.

The growing socio-economic gap and the gap between politicians and citizens has generated a great bipolarisation between the globalists in power (left and right no longer exist) and similar ones, on the one hand, and among those who have not chosen this agenda on the other. All this is at the cost of forcing an enemy of impersonal and natural erosion such as the market.

Today, we have a huge electoral existential dilemma: being or not being, having to decide between two unique possibilities of relationship: either they with us or us without them. The first is excessively excluded by the insoluble trace of inequality and political irresponsibility that they have left in the facts about action and inaction in the twenty-first century. They are lazy, for example, to millions of native youth who have not been able to create their homes and thousands of native families in residential instability, leading them to child poverty and loss of health, as a result of the incitement to the multinational real estate usury to their castes.

Half a century ago, without a choice, we dreamed that one day we would have the opportunity to govern political parties with leaders of democratic mentality and morality. How could one think, from that naive utopia, that today we would arrive at this democratic defeat?

They have won with a great pulse and have made the popular initiative for the hastage of citizenship inevitable: "The establishment of a self-government", with the objective that in the medium term the organization should return those positions that it has only elected its parties. We would have municipalities run by qualified and non-political technicians and professionals to provide services and functions in the field of public self-management and self-discipline. It would be enough... and this is not new, at least in the territory of Euskal Herria, Navarra.

All that exists and we see was nothing but an idea. Let us hope that those tools of control and lying that are available to those who govern us, creating the grief events that prevail today, have an expiration date, as well as the ideas that they created. The power to advance or delay that date is in the hands of the majority of the people, and not of that minority elite, being the land that also begs ours.

Divided global humanity. What inhumane mind did you think of dividing the European people into two? The parties have materialised this division... He who divides wins.

Will we be able not to continue giving life to this death? Here's the bet.

Iulen Lizaso Aldalur