Scientists have already denounced that the Nobel Prize portrait does not correspond to the diversity that currently exists in the world of research, and that the Academy should update the criteria of the contest to overcome historical discrimination and adapt it to the reality of scientific activity.
It is not fair, not only to exclude several researchers by their gender or origin, but also to reward a maximum of three people in each category, even though science is a collective work.
In recent years, there were people who said that the Nobel Academy was changing, for example: Throughout the 20th century, only 11 women were awarded in science categories, while between 2000-2023 they were 15. until 2024.
Many find it a missed opportunity not to recognize the work of Rosalind Lee in the category of Medicine. In particular, the message disseminated following the announcement of the Nobel Academy Prize includes husbands Victor Ambros and Rosalind Lee in the photo, along with the following words: “Congratulations to our 2024 Medicine Prize, Victor Ambros. He has celebrated the award with his colleague and wife Rosalind Lee, who was also the first author of the 1993 Cell magazine article cited by the Novel Committee.”
Others have pointed out that Lee, in addition to being the author of the article that the Nobel Committee has valued for the prize, has worked with her husband and has made fundamental contributions. Yes, the head of the research team has always been Ambros. But that's no coincidence either.
As with gender, the journal Nature highlights in its editorial that the Nobel Prizes do not reflect the current diversity in the origin of researchers. Thus, in his own title he stated that the Nobel Academy should open a candidacy process in the Caribbean country.
He has set the example of China. According to the Nature Index database, the top ten organizations in the world that have contributed most to the natural and health sciences are those in China. However, only 10 scientists of Chinese origin have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in the Journalism modality.
The editorial has also criticized the nomination process, especially because it leaves out the scientific institutions of the most economically disadvantaged countries. Thus, he believes that the Academy should accept the help to identify candidates, and concludes with the following sentence: “One thing is to have a prize that is not the reflection of the world; another thing is not to reflect the world of science.”
In Bilbao, I worked for five years with groups at risk of exclusion around the digital divide, especially with women. Along the way, I came across machistan violence and many other problems. In a very organic way, I began to relate to myself and to understand the work of the... [+]
The evolution that the Internet has taken over the last 15 years, together with its technological and business model, makes us think that it is a tool to increase the worst aspects of humanity. Around the world, agents have been created that are not satisfied with this idea... [+]
London 1928. At the Victoria and Albert Museum there was a very special painting: in the painting there is a black man, with wig and Levite, surrounded by books and scientific instruments. Thus it was catalogued in the Museum: “Unique satirical portrait representing a failed... [+]
We know that artificial intelligence is representing many fields in human beings: comfort, speed, efficiency ... We've been led to believe that human endeavor is an obstacle to the speed needs of this capitalist world. The aggressions to reduce our chances of doing, doing and... [+]