The graft is to bind the part from one plant to another. Artificial creation of new species. So both species start as a single organism. It seems that these confusions are appreciated by humans, since sometimes they allow plants to grow in complex situations or generate opportunities for diversity.

Human beings, like plants, need an appropriate environment to give our best results, adapted to each other's capabilities. But it's not an easy task, so since ancient times we have not only created the best environment for human beings, but we have done adaptive work to the environment in which we live.

Adaptation itself does not have to have bad connotation, if it is a reflexive decision, if it is a change sought, if it is a change that comes from a learning and has benefits for life.

During these days it seems that Elon Muskiz's Neural Link project has started to be tested in humans, but it's not the only one, but China is also developing neural chips.

To think about its social and global impact on the development of technologies, it is convenient to reflect on the business models that will accompany them. We have learned, for example, the harmful effects that GAFAM platforms’ business models are having on companies (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Appple, Microsoft).

Maybe these chips are interesting to increase the possibilities of some humans and animals. For the blind, for example, accessibility can be a bigger technology. It can also alter relationships between species. But I'm not in a hurry to put in my mind the vaccines of companies that create business-driven technology. Today, I have enough to reduce my digital dependence. These vaccines are the last spaces for the dominance of human societies: intention, and with it I perceive the body as the paths. We have to see what will happen and the world that these vaccines will bring, if it can be adapted for those who do not vaccinate.