There are empty lands in the city. If they are public, they will have no fences and the inhabitants of the surrounding area will find them useful, because besides performing activities, the void breathes in the urban fabric without having a park. The displacement that configures daily life provides the interiorization of the empty space scenario, thus constructing an identifiable context in our sensitive memory.

A barrier appears in the urban void of Manteo in San Sebastián. They're going to fill the void. They're going to build the Basque Culinary Center. Oh, when architecture is a threat. Those who live in the neighborhood felt disgusted, until they get to feel a bodily decline, because it's going to forever change something we've done that is somehow part of us. Violence comes into being, I don't mean, like when you don't listen to us. A decision will be made by those who have stepped and surrounded the void from outside and from far and seldom, ignoring the voice of those who defend the void as a void. These decisions must be made from the distance, as when a war shows the position of the bomb with its index finger on the map.

In Urdaibai, in Bizkaia, a feeling similar to that of those attending the demonstration against the new Guggenheim building, a week after Sánchez formed the government, the Spanish ministry has changed the flooding situation in order to build in Murueta.

The cycles of construction, destruction and reconstruction are the history of cities and territories, and the movements against new infrastructures emerge from them. Some urban thinkers affirm that the future of the city should be based on destruction, making voids and expanding the possibility of doing so in another way, recycling the materials of demolition and designing the constructive processes with the agents of the ecosystem that make up the context. But our territory is not vanguard.