Independent Ukraine has been divided between two major socio-political segments: the ethnic nationalist (Western) and the fraternity of the Eastern Slavs (Russian). An oligarchic entourage between two conceptions culminated in the mandate of President Leonid Kutxma (1994-2005), at a time when the communist party was very strong.

Parallel to the prediction of Kutxma's retirement, EE.UU. It launched a strategy to widen its influence in post-Soviet countries, driving colour revolutions. Consequently, Western amateurs broke the entente and provoked confrontation between the oligarchies of both segments, strongly weakening the communist Ukrainians. Following the 2004 Orange Revolution, it was first ruled by Western amateurs and subsequently by Russian amateurs, until the 2014 coup d’état of Maidan against the latter. Since then, the new Ukrainian Government broke the far-right symbology and narrative and began the political, economic and cultural persecution of the increasingly violent segment of the expelled power, using as an excuse Russia ' s intervention in the conflict in Ukraine and the Eastern War.

After five years of Ukrainian conflict, countries could not leave the black hole: the economy was sunk, the war was continuing and the Sirimiri of liberal and anti-democratic policies was infinite. With all this, Volodimir Zelenski promised to end when he was elected President of Ukraine in 2019.

Zelenski received the pragmatic support of the two political segments in the hope of achieving peace and improving the economy. But the regime after the coup has a very rigid ideology, any attempt to nullify policies is overturned by the pressure exerted by ultra-right movements, some of the apparatus of the State and the United States of America.

Zelenski has not made progress on the road to peace, nor on the economic front. Consequently, their support for citizenship has fallen considerably, and at the moment the polls put their party in second place after the party of Russian amateurs. Faced with this reality, the path that has followed to strengthen it has been the adoption of liberal and anti-democratic measures, including the illegal cessation of the President of the Constitutional Court and the closure of three television channels, the hug of extreme nationalism and the increase in tension in the Eastern War, warning that he is prepared to war with troop and arms movements. A few weeks later came the Russian response, organising a series of massive military exercises in the territories of the Russian state bordering Ukraine. Once again, the legion of the alleged analysts and opinion leaders who want a Russian military intervention has failed because Russia has completed its exercises and the army has begun to withdraw to the barracks.

However, the image of Zelenski has been strengthened. Joe Biden calls him over the phone and the United States sends warships to the Black Sea. Zelenski has learned that his strong presence with Russia is rewarded in Washington, and if this is to be done, it is necessary to shed more wood in the war in Eastern Ukraine, as the governments of Kiev and Washington see that the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline going by sea from Russia to Germany is about to end and they no longer know what other conflict or another to stay with Germany. Hence the special interest of Washington and its eastern allies in increasing tension with Russia over the past year.